mouse gfap promoter sequence Search Results


94
Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank gfap
Gfap, supplied by Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gfap/product/Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gfap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Thermo Fisher gene exp gfap mm01253033 m1
hGFAP is the human <t>GFAP</t> DNA fragment used to generate the 73-7 line used as the AxD model (Messing et al., 1998). The WT-1, -2 and -3 transgene is the previously described gfa2-nlac (Brenner et al., 1994); its complete sequence is available from AddGene as part of pGfa2-nLac (Plasmid #53126). WT-4 is identical to WT-1, except that the promoter starts at bp −1757 instead of −2163. The AP1m-1, -2 and -3 transgene is identical to WT-4, except that the AP-1 site has been changed from TGACTCA to TTCAGAA. Nucleotide positions are relative to the RNA start site as +1. The positions for the AP-1 and STAT3 binding sites are the first (5’) nucleotide. The diagrams are not drawn to scale.
Gene Exp Gfap Mm01253033 M1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp gfap mm01253033 m1/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gene exp gfap mm01253033 m1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Cell Signaling Technology Inc 80788s
hGFAP is the human <t>GFAP</t> DNA fragment used to generate the 73-7 line used as the AxD model (Messing et al., 1998). The WT-1, -2 and -3 transgene is the previously described gfa2-nlac (Brenner et al., 1994); its complete sequence is available from AddGene as part of pGfa2-nLac (Plasmid #53126). WT-4 is identical to WT-1, except that the promoter starts at bp −1757 instead of −2163. The AP1m-1, -2 and -3 transgene is identical to WT-4, except that the AP-1 site has been changed from TGACTCA to TTCAGAA. Nucleotide positions are relative to the RNA start site as +1. The positions for the AP-1 and STAT3 binding sites are the first (5’) nucleotide. The diagrams are not drawn to scale.
80788s, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/80788s/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
80788s - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech gfap mouse mcab antibody
hGFAP is the human <t>GFAP</t> DNA fragment used to generate the 73-7 line used as the AxD model (Messing et al., 1998). The WT-1, -2 and -3 transgene is the previously described gfa2-nlac (Brenner et al., 1994); its complete sequence is available from AddGene as part of pGfa2-nLac (Plasmid #53126). WT-4 is identical to WT-1, except that the promoter starts at bp −1757 instead of −2163. The AP1m-1, -2 and -3 transgene is identical to WT-4, except that the AP-1 site has been changed from TGACTCA to TTCAGAA. Nucleotide positions are relative to the RNA start site as +1. The positions for the AP-1 and STAT3 binding sites are the first (5’) nucleotide. The diagrams are not drawn to scale.
Gfap Mouse Mcab Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gfap mouse mcab antibody/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gfap mouse mcab antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Cell Signaling Technology Inc gfap
(A, B) Tumor purity of 364 and 369 TCGA IDH-WT GBM samples was determined by ABSOLUTE (A) and ESTIMATE (B), respectively. The difference in tumor purity between subtypes was evaluated using a two-sample Student t-test. (C) Comparison <t>of</t> <t>ITGAM</t> and AIF1 gene expression levels between GBM and derived neurosphere models. N.MES indicates non-mesenchymal cases. (D) The upper panel shows ssGSEA enrichment scores and associated expression subtype classifications. Bottom panels display protein expression of the microglial markers ITGAM and AIF1, astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein <t>(GFAP)</t> and the loading control tubulin and vinculin. (E) Comparison of immune cell fractions among subtypes. Immune cell fractions were estimated using CIBERSORT and corrected using ABSOLUTE purity scores per sample. The distribution of immune cell fractions of 86 PN, 136 CL and 104 MES IDH-WT GBMs with simplicity score>0.05 were shown by purple, skyblue and green boxplots, respectively. Median value difference of cell fraction among subtypes was evaluated using Mood's test. Boxplots represent 25th and 75th percentiles, with midlines indicating the median values and points within the boxes indicating the mean values. Whiskers extend to the lowest/highest values of the data sample excluding outliers (A-C, E). See also Figure S3 and Table S5.
Gfap, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gfap/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gfap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc 12389 gfap mouse
(A, B) Tumor purity of 364 and 369 TCGA IDH-WT GBM samples was determined by ABSOLUTE (A) and ESTIMATE (B), respectively. The difference in tumor purity between subtypes was evaluated using a two-sample Student t-test. (C) Comparison <t>of</t> <t>ITGAM</t> and AIF1 gene expression levels between GBM and derived neurosphere models. N.MES indicates non-mesenchymal cases. (D) The upper panel shows ssGSEA enrichment scores and associated expression subtype classifications. Bottom panels display protein expression of the microglial markers ITGAM and AIF1, astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein <t>(GFAP)</t> and the loading control tubulin and vinculin. (E) Comparison of immune cell fractions among subtypes. Immune cell fractions were estimated using CIBERSORT and corrected using ABSOLUTE purity scores per sample. The distribution of immune cell fractions of 86 PN, 136 CL and 104 MES IDH-WT GBMs with simplicity score>0.05 were shown by purple, skyblue and green boxplots, respectively. Median value difference of cell fraction among subtypes was evaluated using Mood's test. Boxplots represent 25th and 75th percentiles, with midlines indicating the median values and points within the boxes indicating the mean values. Whiskers extend to the lowest/highest values of the data sample excluding outliers (A-C, E). See also Figure S3 and Table S5.
12389 Gfap Mouse, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/12389 gfap mouse/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
12389 gfap mouse - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti gfap
(A, B) Tumor purity of 364 and 369 TCGA IDH-WT GBM samples was determined by ABSOLUTE (A) and ESTIMATE (B), respectively. The difference in tumor purity between subtypes was evaluated using a two-sample Student t-test. (C) Comparison <t>of</t> <t>ITGAM</t> and AIF1 gene expression levels between GBM and derived neurosphere models. N.MES indicates non-mesenchymal cases. (D) The upper panel shows ssGSEA enrichment scores and associated expression subtype classifications. Bottom panels display protein expression of the microglial markers ITGAM and AIF1, astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein <t>(GFAP)</t> and the loading control tubulin and vinculin. (E) Comparison of immune cell fractions among subtypes. Immune cell fractions were estimated using CIBERSORT and corrected using ABSOLUTE purity scores per sample. The distribution of immune cell fractions of 86 PN, 136 CL and 104 MES IDH-WT GBMs with simplicity score>0.05 were shown by purple, skyblue and green boxplots, respectively. Median value difference of cell fraction among subtypes was evaluated using Mood's test. Boxplots represent 25th and 75th percentiles, with midlines indicating the median values and points within the boxes indicating the mean values. Whiskers extend to the lowest/highest values of the data sample excluding outliers (A-C, E). See also Figure S3 and Table S5.
Anti Gfap, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti gfap/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti gfap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Cell Signaling Technology Inc mouse monoclonal anti gfap
(A, B) Tumor purity of 364 and 369 TCGA IDH-WT GBM samples was determined by ABSOLUTE (A) and ESTIMATE (B), respectively. The difference in tumor purity between subtypes was evaluated using a two-sample Student t-test. (C) Comparison <t>of</t> <t>ITGAM</t> and AIF1 gene expression levels between GBM and derived neurosphere models. N.MES indicates non-mesenchymal cases. (D) The upper panel shows ssGSEA enrichment scores and associated expression subtype classifications. Bottom panels display protein expression of the microglial markers ITGAM and AIF1, astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein <t>(GFAP)</t> and the loading control tubulin and vinculin. (E) Comparison of immune cell fractions among subtypes. Immune cell fractions were estimated using CIBERSORT and corrected using ABSOLUTE purity scores per sample. The distribution of immune cell fractions of 86 PN, 136 CL and 104 MES IDH-WT GBMs with simplicity score>0.05 were shown by purple, skyblue and green boxplots, respectively. Median value difference of cell fraction among subtypes was evaluated using Mood's test. Boxplots represent 25th and 75th percentiles, with midlines indicating the median values and points within the boxes indicating the mean values. Whiskers extend to the lowest/highest values of the data sample excluding outliers (A-C, E). See also Figure S3 and Table S5.
Mouse Monoclonal Anti Gfap, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti gfap/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse monoclonal anti gfap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Novus Biologicals rabbit anti glial fibrillary acidic protein
(A, B) Tumor purity of 364 and 369 TCGA IDH-WT GBM samples was determined by ABSOLUTE (A) and ESTIMATE (B), respectively. The difference in tumor purity between subtypes was evaluated using a two-sample Student t-test. (C) Comparison <t>of</t> <t>ITGAM</t> and AIF1 gene expression levels between GBM and derived neurosphere models. N.MES indicates non-mesenchymal cases. (D) The upper panel shows ssGSEA enrichment scores and associated expression subtype classifications. Bottom panels display protein expression of the microglial markers ITGAM and AIF1, astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein <t>(GFAP)</t> and the loading control tubulin and vinculin. (E) Comparison of immune cell fractions among subtypes. Immune cell fractions were estimated using CIBERSORT and corrected using ABSOLUTE purity scores per sample. The distribution of immune cell fractions of 86 PN, 136 CL and 104 MES IDH-WT GBMs with simplicity score>0.05 were shown by purple, skyblue and green boxplots, respectively. Median value difference of cell fraction among subtypes was evaluated using Mood's test. Boxplots represent 25th and 75th percentiles, with midlines indicating the median values and points within the boxes indicating the mean values. Whiskers extend to the lowest/highest values of the data sample excluding outliers (A-C, E). See also Figure S3 and Table S5.
Rabbit Anti Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti glial fibrillary acidic protein/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti glial fibrillary acidic protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech rrid gfpt1 human gfpt1 gfpt1 proteintech
(A, B) Tumor purity of 364 and 369 TCGA IDH-WT GBM samples was determined by ABSOLUTE (A) and ESTIMATE (B), respectively. The difference in tumor purity between subtypes was evaluated using a two-sample Student t-test. (C) Comparison <t>of</t> <t>ITGAM</t> and AIF1 gene expression levels between GBM and derived neurosphere models. N.MES indicates non-mesenchymal cases. (D) The upper panel shows ssGSEA enrichment scores and associated expression subtype classifications. Bottom panels display protein expression of the microglial markers ITGAM and AIF1, astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein <t>(GFAP)</t> and the loading control tubulin and vinculin. (E) Comparison of immune cell fractions among subtypes. Immune cell fractions were estimated using CIBERSORT and corrected using ABSOLUTE purity scores per sample. The distribution of immune cell fractions of 86 PN, 136 CL and 104 MES IDH-WT GBMs with simplicity score>0.05 were shown by purple, skyblue and green boxplots, respectively. Median value difference of cell fraction among subtypes was evaluated using Mood's test. Boxplots represent 25th and 75th percentiles, with midlines indicating the median values and points within the boxes indicating the mean values. Whiskers extend to the lowest/highest values of the data sample excluding outliers (A-C, E). See also Figure S3 and Table S5.
Rrid Gfpt1 Human Gfpt1 Gfpt1 Proteintech, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rrid gfpt1 human gfpt1 gfpt1 proteintech/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rrid gfpt1 human gfpt1 gfpt1 proteintech - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech gfap fusion protein
(A, B) Tumor purity of 364 and 369 TCGA IDH-WT GBM samples was determined by ABSOLUTE (A) and ESTIMATE (B), respectively. The difference in tumor purity between subtypes was evaluated using a two-sample Student t-test. (C) Comparison <t>of</t> <t>ITGAM</t> and AIF1 gene expression levels between GBM and derived neurosphere models. N.MES indicates non-mesenchymal cases. (D) The upper panel shows ssGSEA enrichment scores and associated expression subtype classifications. Bottom panels display protein expression of the microglial markers ITGAM and AIF1, astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein <t>(GFAP)</t> and the loading control tubulin and vinculin. (E) Comparison of immune cell fractions among subtypes. Immune cell fractions were estimated using CIBERSORT and corrected using ABSOLUTE purity scores per sample. The distribution of immune cell fractions of 86 PN, 136 CL and 104 MES IDH-WT GBMs with simplicity score>0.05 were shown by purple, skyblue and green boxplots, respectively. Median value difference of cell fraction among subtypes was evaluated using Mood's test. Boxplots represent 25th and 75th percentiles, with midlines indicating the median values and points within the boxes indicating the mean values. Whiskers extend to the lowest/highest values of the data sample excluding outliers (A-C, E). See also Figure S3 and Table S5.
Gfap Fusion Protein, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gfap fusion protein/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gfap fusion protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Vector Laboratories goat anti rabbit
(A, B) Tumor purity of 364 and 369 TCGA IDH-WT GBM samples was determined by ABSOLUTE (A) and ESTIMATE (B), respectively. The difference in tumor purity between subtypes was evaluated using a two-sample Student t-test. (C) Comparison <t>of</t> <t>ITGAM</t> and AIF1 gene expression levels between GBM and derived neurosphere models. N.MES indicates non-mesenchymal cases. (D) The upper panel shows ssGSEA enrichment scores and associated expression subtype classifications. Bottom panels display protein expression of the microglial markers ITGAM and AIF1, astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein <t>(GFAP)</t> and the loading control tubulin and vinculin. (E) Comparison of immune cell fractions among subtypes. Immune cell fractions were estimated using CIBERSORT and corrected using ABSOLUTE purity scores per sample. The distribution of immune cell fractions of 86 PN, 136 CL and 104 MES IDH-WT GBMs with simplicity score>0.05 were shown by purple, skyblue and green boxplots, respectively. Median value difference of cell fraction among subtypes was evaluated using Mood's test. Boxplots represent 25th and 75th percentiles, with midlines indicating the median values and points within the boxes indicating the mean values. Whiskers extend to the lowest/highest values of the data sample excluding outliers (A-C, E). See also Figure S3 and Table S5.
Goat Anti Rabbit, supplied by Vector Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/goat anti rabbit/product/Vector Laboratories
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
goat anti rabbit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


hGFAP is the human GFAP DNA fragment used to generate the 73-7 line used as the AxD model (Messing et al., 1998). The WT-1, -2 and -3 transgene is the previously described gfa2-nlac (Brenner et al., 1994); its complete sequence is available from AddGene as part of pGfa2-nLac (Plasmid #53126). WT-4 is identical to WT-1, except that the promoter starts at bp −1757 instead of −2163. The AP1m-1, -2 and -3 transgene is identical to WT-4, except that the AP-1 site has been changed from TGACTCA to TTCAGAA. Nucleotide positions are relative to the RNA start site as +1. The positions for the AP-1 and STAT3 binding sites are the first (5’) nucleotide. The diagrams are not drawn to scale.

Journal: Journal of neuroscience research

Article Title: AP-1 and the injury response of the GFAP gene

doi: 10.1002/jnr.24338

Figure Lengend Snippet: hGFAP is the human GFAP DNA fragment used to generate the 73-7 line used as the AxD model (Messing et al., 1998). The WT-1, -2 and -3 transgene is the previously described gfa2-nlac (Brenner et al., 1994); its complete sequence is available from AddGene as part of pGfa2-nLac (Plasmid #53126). WT-4 is identical to WT-1, except that the promoter starts at bp −1757 instead of −2163. The AP1m-1, -2 and -3 transgene is identical to WT-4, except that the AP-1 site has been changed from TGACTCA to TTCAGAA. Nucleotide positions are relative to the RNA start site as +1. The positions for the AP-1 and STAT3 binding sites are the first (5’) nucleotide. The diagrams are not drawn to scale.

Article Snippet: The probe/primer sets were 4352339E for mouse Gapdh, Mm01253033_m1 for mouse Gfap and Hs00909238_g1 for human GFAP.

Techniques: Sequencing, Plasmid Preparation, Binding Assay

Responses of h  GFAP-lacZ  transgenes to injuries.

Journal: Journal of neuroscience research

Article Title: AP-1 and the injury response of the GFAP gene

doi: 10.1002/jnr.24338

Figure Lengend Snippet: Responses of h GFAP-lacZ transgenes to injuries.

Article Snippet: The probe/primer sets were 4352339E for mouse Gapdh, Mm01253033_m1 for mouse Gfap and Hs00909238_g1 for human GFAP.

Techniques:

Effect of STAT inhibition on basal and injury-induced  Gfap  expression.

Journal: Journal of neuroscience research

Article Title: AP-1 and the injury response of the GFAP gene

doi: 10.1002/jnr.24338

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of STAT inhibition on basal and injury-induced Gfap expression.

Article Snippet: The probe/primer sets were 4352339E for mouse Gapdh, Mm01253033_m1 for mouse Gfap and Hs00909238_g1 for human GFAP.

Techniques: Inhibition, Expressing, Control, Over Expression, Western Blot

(A, B) Tumor purity of 364 and 369 TCGA IDH-WT GBM samples was determined by ABSOLUTE (A) and ESTIMATE (B), respectively. The difference in tumor purity between subtypes was evaluated using a two-sample Student t-test. (C) Comparison of ITGAM and AIF1 gene expression levels between GBM and derived neurosphere models. N.MES indicates non-mesenchymal cases. (D) The upper panel shows ssGSEA enrichment scores and associated expression subtype classifications. Bottom panels display protein expression of the microglial markers ITGAM and AIF1, astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and the loading control tubulin and vinculin. (E) Comparison of immune cell fractions among subtypes. Immune cell fractions were estimated using CIBERSORT and corrected using ABSOLUTE purity scores per sample. The distribution of immune cell fractions of 86 PN, 136 CL and 104 MES IDH-WT GBMs with simplicity score>0.05 were shown by purple, skyblue and green boxplots, respectively. Median value difference of cell fraction among subtypes was evaluated using Mood's test. Boxplots represent 25th and 75th percentiles, with midlines indicating the median values and points within the boxes indicating the mean values. Whiskers extend to the lowest/highest values of the data sample excluding outliers (A-C, E). See also Figure S3 and Table S5.

Journal: Cancer cell

Article Title: Tumor evolution of glioma intrinsic gene expression subtype associates with immunological changes in the microenvironment

doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.06.003

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A, B) Tumor purity of 364 and 369 TCGA IDH-WT GBM samples was determined by ABSOLUTE (A) and ESTIMATE (B), respectively. The difference in tumor purity between subtypes was evaluated using a two-sample Student t-test. (C) Comparison of ITGAM and AIF1 gene expression levels between GBM and derived neurosphere models. N.MES indicates non-mesenchymal cases. (D) The upper panel shows ssGSEA enrichment scores and associated expression subtype classifications. Bottom panels display protein expression of the microglial markers ITGAM and AIF1, astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and the loading control tubulin and vinculin. (E) Comparison of immune cell fractions among subtypes. Immune cell fractions were estimated using CIBERSORT and corrected using ABSOLUTE purity scores per sample. The distribution of immune cell fractions of 86 PN, 136 CL and 104 MES IDH-WT GBMs with simplicity score>0.05 were shown by purple, skyblue and green boxplots, respectively. Median value difference of cell fraction among subtypes was evaluated using Mood's test. Boxplots represent 25th and 75th percentiles, with midlines indicating the median values and points within the boxes indicating the mean values. Whiskers extend to the lowest/highest values of the data sample excluding outliers (A-C, E). See also Figure S3 and Table S5.

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies include ITGAM (CD11B) (Sigma Aldrich, #HPA002274), AIF1 (IBA1) (Wako, #016-20001), GFAP (Cell Signaling, #3670), NF1 (clone McNFn27b, GeneTex, #GTX15776), Actin (Sigma Aldrich, A5044), Vinculin (EMD Millipore, # 05-386) and Tubulin (Cell Signaling, #2128).

Techniques: Comparison, Gene Expression, Derivative Assay, Expressing, Marker, Control

Key Resources Table

Journal: Cancer cell

Article Title: Tumor evolution of glioma intrinsic gene expression subtype associates with immunological changes in the microenvironment

doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.06.003

Figure Lengend Snippet: Key Resources Table

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies include ITGAM (CD11B) (Sigma Aldrich, #HPA002274), AIF1 (IBA1) (Wako, #016-20001), GFAP (Cell Signaling, #3670), NF1 (clone McNFn27b, GeneTex, #GTX15776), Actin (Sigma Aldrich, A5044), Vinculin (EMD Millipore, # 05-386) and Tubulin (Cell Signaling, #2128).

Techniques: Recombinant, Purification, Staining, cDNA Synthesis, Sample Prep, RNA Sequencing, Software